The following article is an overview of the “Steps of Salvation”. You can read my critique of the “Steps” here.
The early teachings of the Restoration Movement emphasised logic and order. One of Alexander Campbell’s major works is even titled The Christian System. This attitude encourages Bible scholars to consider all of Scripture when developing doctrines as it anticipates consistency of thought and teaching throughout Scripture. We should regard this big picture perspective as a strength of the Restoration approach.
The quest for system has also resulted in teachers constructing logical doctrines where the Bible doesn’t explicitly give them. In time, the doctrines of logic become as staunchly defended as God’s Word itself. Making logical conclusions as we study Scripture is not wrong, it’s natural, and we often arrive at correct conclusions. However, we also know that all human logic fails at some point. We should never regard logical doctrines on the same basis as Scripture itself.
One of the “systems” that the early Restorationists developed was the “Plan of Salvation”. Although the view that “believers baptism (immersion) was for the remission of sins” distinguished them from contemporary denominations, baptism alone provides an incomplete answer to the question, “What must I do to be saved?”
In 1827 Walter Scott described the Gospel under six points. In the context of Jesus’ sacrifice and resurrection, humans should:
In response God would:
- Forgive sins,
- Give the gift of the Holy Spirit, and
- Grant eternal life.
Later, Scott would combine the last two points to summarise the Gospel as five points that could easily be remembered using fingers. It’s worth noting that these are not “Steps in order to obtain Salvation”, but a description of what takes place AS one is saved with God doing most of the work. According to Boring in Disciples and the Bible (42) everyone in all churches believed accepted these steps individually, but “Scott repeatedly insists that it is not only having the right things, but having them in the right order, that is important (e.g., The Gospel Restored, 246).”
As I researched this topic I was surprised to find how much the “Plan of Salvation” has varied through the years. This serves to remind us that it’s a human construct, not explicit Scriptural teaching. This observation doesn’t diminish the importance of each “step”, it just reminds us that our steps aren’t necessarily exhaustive, or perhaps even required.
Even contemporary with Walter Scott, Alexander Campbell would often list
- Believe,
- Repent,
- Be baptised,
as the three primary saving events. Although at times he would mention confession of Christ as Lord, and the need to continue in Christian faith and practice, the first three remained primary.
According to Boring (396) In the 1860s David Lipscomb acknowledged ‘faith, repentance, confession, baptism’ as standard doctrine.” The inclusion of confession as one of the steps developed into a significant debate in the late 1800′s and early 1900′s. (You can read more of this debate in an article by Dr John Mark Hicks here.)
Somewhere in the 1930s Scott’s “Five Finger Gospel” crystallised its transition to “A Five Step Plan of Salvation”. The five steps came to concentrate solely upon the human response to the Gospel of Christ and now included “Hear” as the first step. Some less common alternative Five Step plans omitted “Hear” and included “Christian life” as the fifth step. So the final version of the Plan of Salvation looks like this:
- HEAR – Romans 10:17,
- BELIEVE – John 1:11-12, Acts 8:36-37, Romans 10:9
- REPENT – Luke 13:3, 5, Acts 2:38, 17:30, 2 Peter 3:9
- CONFESS – Matt 10:32-33, Romans 10:9-10; Acts 8:37
- Be BAPTIZED – 1 Peter 3:21, Acts 22:16, Romans 6:3-5
- ( GROW – 2 Peter3:18)
I find this evolution really interesting. I hope you do too. I’m currently preaching a sermon series titled “Daily Steps of Salvation”. You can read my reflections on these subjects here.
Resources I used in compiling this included:
- Disciples and the Bible by Eugene Boring (includes a 6 page excurses on the Five Finger Exercise)
- Renewing God’s People by Holloway & Foster
Some other websites on this topic that I found include:
- http://www.fivesimplesteps.org/
- http://marksadams.blogspot.com/2007/08/rethinking-5-finger-exercise.html
- http://historeo.com/web/?p=1117
- http://johnmarkhicks.wordpress.com/2009/02/25/g-c-brewer-on-grace/ (of particular interest is the quote at the end of the article.)


Hi Peter,
Thanks for the reference link. I think the broader context of the Five-Step Plan is the “scholastic” impulse within Western culture to systematize faith with reason. The Five-Step plan reflects the Stone-Campbell Restoration Movement’s (SCRM) expression of that impulse.
See http://historeo.com/Resources/historyofscholasticismmr.jpg for my take on it.
I see you got your MDiv from Harding. I got mine from Lipscomb (starting out with an MS in BRS from Abilene).
I think we may be fellow travelers on the pilgrimage of adapting SCRM ideals to a new cultural context.
If so, I would really value any critique you can offer.
Peace,
billb
http://historeo.com
By: Bill Brewer on 11 February, 2012
at 9:22 am
Hi Bill,
It sounds like if you get a DMin from Harding you can start building houses and hotels!!
Thanks for taking the time to leave a comment. There’s no doubt that the origins and popularity of the Five Finger Exercise reflect the thinking and culture of the day. The modernistic emphasis on logic was well and truly in full swing.
It’s been my understanding that part of the attraction of the Five Finger Exercise wasn’t just in its logic, but as a contrast to other major churches at the time. Strong Calvinist churches gave people no assurance of salvation until after the church acknowledge a spiritual “experience” in a person indicating they were part of God’s family. The contrast of each individual having concrete “steps” to respond to the Gospel rather than waiting and hoping was tremendously attractive.
By: ozziepete on 13 February, 2012
at 1:11 pm
I think you’re right.
My recollection is Scott taught it to the kids and the kids went home to tell their parents.
Times have changed though. I don’t think any unacquainted man could safely engage kids in a conversation in public nowadays.
Regards,
billb
By: Bill Brewer on 13 February, 2012
at 4:56 pm
[...] I’ve encountered some Christians who want to restrict the practice of compassion and grace to the preaching of the Gospel (where Gospel has a very narrow definition). Although followers of Christ understand that the cross and resurrection of Jesus address our greatest need, forgiveness and restored relationship with God, the world doesn’t have the same perspective. It beggars belief in my mind that anyone can take the numerous Scriptural exhortations to love, compassion, kindness, humility, and service and limit them to preaching the Five Steps of Salvation! [...]
By: Compassionate & Gracious God « Peter’s Patter on 16 April, 2012
at 2:03 pm